@feld @chiasm @freemo

This is by an organization focused on evidence-based medicine, in this context they require very strong evidence to assert something, otherwise they will use these "probably".

Evidently you can't interpret the results in context, so you just focus on wording in the abstract.

@post @feld @chiasm

So wqe agree that the evidence to support a conclusion is very weak?

@freemo @feld @chiasm

It depends, do you know how difficult it is for Cochrane to say that there is strong evidence? Context matters.

@post @freemo @feld I've heard a lot of those Cochrane reports on various topics, I've never seen one with such strong statements regarding the poor quality of the studies that they are reviewing and the lack of strong evidence. This is as close to Cochrane saying there's really nothing there and we can't say anything about it as I think I've ever seen.

Follow

@chiasm @freemo @feld

I value your experience and I have no doubt it is genuine. What I am saying is that what many would consider an evidence it is not for Cochrane.

The entire pharmaceutical industry is based on weak evidence and that is why organizations like Cochrane exist.

People who comment here as if Cochrane did just another study and not a systematic review of 78 studies probably don't realize how many drugs are currently in the market without the strong evidence they are requiring now against masks.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.