| What is thinking |
The word: “tree” is-not-equal to a real tree. The word: “tree” is a symbol to remind you about an experience with a real tree.
Words are not-equal to the, real-life-facts themselves, words only do describing real-life-facts. They are symbols. You have to look behind words/thoughts, (your own words/thoughts and the words of your counterpart), when you want to understand what exactly is said/written/thought.
What life-experienced facts/situations do you have to define the words you use, and that you read/hear?
Explaining the exception: Or: the truth about thinking itself:
Words themselves are also facts. Like in the case of the word: “word”, a word is the-real-life-fact behind the word: “word”
Do not be deceived by opinions. What is opinion/thinking in itself?
The word: "tree" is not like a real tree, the word: "tree" is just a symbol to remind a person of an experience with a real tree. A real tree is the fact behind the word "tree."
If you want to understand the truth of a tree, you don't achieve it by thinking. You have to go into the forest, see a tree and maybe also touch it. Only then one begins to encounter and understand the reality/truth of a tree. Primarily, you understand life, with seeing life, not with thinking the word: “life”.
The light of the sun, reflected by the whole life, is one of the most important information-dense bearers, of the truth, of what is going on in the world.
Not the thoughts in your head.
Words and thoughts are very similar.
You can prove that easily in your own life, and in the worldwideweb you can prove it by doing little research: :
search at Wikipedia and Wikimedia
Harmonia Macrocosmica
Find out what the pictures in the atlas named Harmonia Macrocosmica mean,
