New paper estimates the replicability of >14,000 psychology papers using machine learning. They found:
1. "Experiments replicate at a significantly lower rate than do non-experimental studies"
2. "authors’ cumulative publication # and citation impact are positively related to the likelihood of replication"
3. "media attention is positively related to the likelihood of replication failure"
via https://www.pnas.org/doi/10.1073/pnas.2208863120
#Science @academicchatter #Psychology #MetaScience #ReplicationCrisis #SciComm
Follow
@erinnacland Didn't read the article. What do they mean by replication of non experimental results? What exactly are they replicating?
