@pie @alex Ooh, Wikipedia screenshot!

@realcaseyrollins @alex if a place is known to be a safe haven for white supremacists and alt righters, and its only merits are allowing this, then why would anyone ever join if they did not share those beliefs

@pie I actually brought this up in my interview w/ @alex for today's episode of the podcast; apparently, not everyone looks to Wikipedia for advice before signing up for #Gab.

@pie @alex Unless of course people like confronting alt-right and racist ideas, then I can see it attracting those sorts of people as well.

@pie @realcaseyrollins @alex
>if a place is known to be X
>why would anyone ever join if they did not also like X
not everyone takes clickbait rage and knee jerk social media as seriously as wikipedia does

@pie @realcaseyrollins @alex >The site has been widely described Weasel words. >”safe haven” Who is being quoted? >neo-nazis, white supremacists, alt-right Not a single citation to any neo-nazi, white supremacist, or alt-righter.

This is why we call them (((wikipedia))).

@pie @realcaseyrollins @alex Bahahaha

Gab bans everyone, even those who speak against the jews

@Elfie @pie @alex @realcaseyrollins Yeah, that shit makes Gab sound a lot cooler than it really is.

@ChristiJunior @alex @pie @realcaseyrollins gab is just Mastodon 2.0, torba wants normies, even if that means fucking over the boomers who trusted him