@rysiek

A way of using it that I found not irritating was to use it for questions of examples of things where (a) you are reasonably convinced they don't exist (b) it's easyish to verify if they do (e.g. molecules that contain helium). You don't run the risk of being fooled by its overeloquence on account of (a), and you don't end up unsure on account of (b). (The way (b) works is usually by way of you looking for a name of a thing that you can then look up.)