Why MAY is so negative? I think I saw it often used to indicate something that's a reasonable thing to do, but not something the RFC wanted to make a recommendation about either way (except to point out that the possibility exists and doesn't contravene any other requirements).
@robryk MAY is often used as a way to signal deprecations: things that can't be removed due to legacy interop reasons, but shouldn't be encouraged in modern implementations
@robryk MAY is often used as a way to signal deprecations: things that can't be removed due to legacy interop reasons, but shouldn't be encouraged in modern implementations