I never really understood why: signal strength of brain compared to everything else is not used diagnostically. I don't think PET is so close to the acceptable SNR boundary that the amount of "shiny glucose" this takes away from everywhere else matters (or am I wrong?). Or does this introduce variations _within_ the brain that might be confusing?
Also, _good luck_ getting some people not to think too hard :)
@robryk No idea, it's just what I was told! My guess is it's harder to spot weird stuff in an active brain vs. a chilled one? (Checking the brain in this scan wasn't a primary goal, just a nice extra.)