If an employer ever asks you to resign, tell them "no".

There is no benefit to resigning unless you have another job lined up already.

Make them fire you. Get your unemployment benefits. Make sure you are legally protected in case of malfeasance. Resigning undermines all of that.

This message brought to you by AWS telling workers to return to office 5-days-a-week by commuting or relocating, or they should resign.

Again, the answer is "no, you'll have to fire me."

EDIT: To clarify, in most areas "fired" and "let go" are not legally meaningful terms and can be used interchangeably. The important term is "for cause" or not. So don't commit misconduct to get fired. Poor job performance is typically not a "for cause" reason, nor is failure to accept changes like RTO

I don't know what is in their contracts, but all those I've seen include the place where you have to work. If that indicates the office, you cannot refuse to come in, hence you have to resign OR do the job in the location you signed up for. In that respect, their statement is probably correct.
Follow

@gvs @neatchee

This might not be as obvious in some places. For example, in some places the company cannot lower the salary, even to a value that's higher than the original salary in the employment contract (not taking into account any subsequent raises). If they want to do that, they need to satisfy the requirements for firing the employee (and, if the employee demurs, they need to actually fire him). I wouldn't be surprised if, at least in some places, same applied to working conditions.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.