and yet they haven't implemented any use of this carefully-hoarded resource to manage energy costs in chilly weather.
@munin @SwiftOnSecurity London doesn't get "chilly weather" this century.
I expect not, with all that untapped heat resourcing just leaking through the foundations like that!
@munin @SwiftOnSecurity A tube train draws up to 6MW of juice when starting from cold. There are about 180km of underground tube tunnels in the London network. Trains average 33km/h and run about 2-5 minutes apart, so there are probably about 100 trains running underground at any given time. That's a LOT of waste heat …
@cstross @munin @SwiftOnSecurity
Do you know what's the efficiency of pushing power into something (train grid? above-surface resistors?) when braking?
@robryk @cstross @SwiftOnSecurity
Regardless of braking methodology, heat will be generated at the braking surface and there are no easy ways to dissipate that from the immediate environment.
@munin @robryk @cstross @SwiftOnSecurity not with electric braking
@munin @cliffordheath @cstross @SwiftOnSecurity
Electric braking in trains is usually (always?) not eddy current braking, but running the motors as generators and connecting something to the motor. In somewhat older days that something was either the overhead wire (with engines set up so that they generate a higher voltage) or a bunch of onboard resistors (that is still sometimes the case in trams). I would expect that trains with a VFDful drive etc. do something more interesting there, where they are able to dump that into overhead wire at lower speeds. Obviously the question of ability of the overhead grid to sink that power (assuming insufficiently many other accelerating trains on the same overhead segment) is a separate issue.