> lower than what would have been without lockdown, obviously.
Sorry, I don' t buy any crystal ball argument.
> Where do you even get this sort of anti-science nonsense from
From science.
https://swprs.org/studies-on-covid-19-lethality/
> Like i said its on a level of absurdity its hard to even respond to.
Likewise. No matter how you try to slice it, the numbers for COVID-19 are not significantly different than for seasonal flu.
> It would be like debunking a flat-earther, how do you even debunk someone who says things that arent even close to the reality of the situation?
I don't know. How can I convince you the sky is NOT falling?
I can't. No matter what data or peer reviewed studies I show you, they'll all be wrong. Summarily. No science provided, simply flat earther ad hominem.
We do agree on one thing. Rational discussion on this topic seems a bit out of reach.
@sda Nope wrong, sweden enacted social distancing, though a relaxed form from other countries. They are required to keep arms length apart or farther, and all establishments are required to enforce this (though otherwise remain open). this required, for examples, tables to be spaces out farther than usual. In addition high schools were closed and gatherings of 50 people or more banned entirely..
Want to take a second try? Perhaps you should try doing some research about the opinions you hold?