@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells
You can take quotes from the datasheets until the cows come home for all I care. 🤡
I'm just interested in the numbers.
They can spin things all they like but the numbers don't lie buddy.
Lets have a look at Absolute Risk Reduction shall we?
80+ 19%
70-79 7%
60-69. 2% 🤡
50-59 0.5% 🤡 🤡
40-49. 0.15% 🤡 🤡 🤡
30-39. 0.05% 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡
18-29. 0.01% 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡 🤡
Your opening graphs are complete BS.
@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells
Hospital overnight stays page 37 🤔
@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells
Page 8 wow. Smells like relative numbers rather than absolute buddy. You know why they use relative? Cos they're usually bigger numbers.
When you're stabbing the populace like they're on a merry-go-round the only thing that should matter is ABSOLUTE numbers.
You can see from an earlier post why they refuse to talk about those. 😉
Short (!!) term benefit for 70+ but for everyone else this is pretty much a dud.
@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells
So what's the source for those nice graphs of yours mate? 🙄
@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells
So if you plotted the graphs, you must have the raw numbers right? 🤔
@11112011 @Humpleupagus @skells
oh dear, you don't seem to have any data do you? 💩
@11112011 @Humpleupagus @YorkshireTea quick, just use vague grammar they might lose interest