@graf Maybe I'm too cynical, but I was saying last year that they're prepping to throw him under the bus so that the farce can continue and everyone will think the problem's solved.
@p @graf I just read a fascinating series of articles implicatingthe pharma-bureau complex of, essentially, fabricating the AIDS epidemic wholesale. iirc fauci was involved, although he's not named in these documents.
essentially after big pharma failed to find a cancer virus they just made it up. the meds are basically repurposed chemotherapy drugs.
> Remarkably, only 8%
> (3 of 36) of the patients not treated with anti-HIV drugs
> have died since their HIV antibodies were first detected
> ...
> > By contrast, 63% of all German AIDS patients (11,700
> out of 18,700) of which most were treated since 1987
> with anti-HIV drugs have died
would not at all be surprised if big pharma was doing another fake-out again, they don't sell their shots for free
essentially after big pharma failed to find a cancer virus they just made it up. the meds are basically repurposed chemotherapy drugs.
> Remarkably, only 8%
> (3 of 36) of the patients not treated with anti-HIV drugs
> have died since their HIV antibodies were first detected
> ...
> > By contrast, 63% of all German AIDS patients (11,700
> out of 18,700) of which most were treated since 1987
> with anti-HIV drugs have died
would not at all be surprised if big pharma was doing another fake-out again, they don't sell their shots for free
@Moon @p @graf
if I'm reading this document correctly, i'm shocked.
not only is the disease non-contageous, and actually a name for a bundle of different diseases, but it's essentially the name for partying so hard that your body gets fucked from too much drugs (e.g. dementia, pneumonia, etc.).
Basically people were partying to death in the 80s and pharma-scholar complex took some virus that was benign (HIV) and built an entire industry around it. A quote:
> The virus was introduced as fortunate
> fallout of the failed War on Cancer. The next day the new
> virus was already termed, the “AIDS virus”, by the New
> York Times (Altman 1984). Overnight nearly all AIDS
> researchers dropped the lifestyle-AIDS hypothesis to work
> on the new “AIDS virus”, which was already endorsed by
> the US government. The CDC’s director of the Task
> Force on Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections,
> James Curran, was the only one who later announced the
> reason for his conversion to the new “AIDS virus”:
> “That’s where the money is” (Shilts 1987).
unreal, what the hell
if I'm reading this document correctly, i'm shocked.
not only is the disease non-contageous, and actually a name for a bundle of different diseases, but it's essentially the name for partying so hard that your body gets fucked from too much drugs (e.g. dementia, pneumonia, etc.).
Basically people were partying to death in the 80s and pharma-scholar complex took some virus that was benign (HIV) and built an entire industry around it. A quote:
> The virus was introduced as fortunate
> fallout of the failed War on Cancer. The next day the new
> virus was already termed, the “AIDS virus”, by the New
> York Times (Altman 1984). Overnight nearly all AIDS
> researchers dropped the lifestyle-AIDS hypothesis to work
> on the new “AIDS virus”, which was already endorsed by
> the US government. The CDC’s director of the Task
> Force on Kaposi’s Sarcoma and Opportunistic Infections,
> James Curran, was the only one who later announced the
> reason for his conversion to the new “AIDS virus”:
> “That’s where the money is” (Shilts 1987).
unreal, what the hell
