Declaring a major event that you haven't investigated, that has tons of supporting evidence, but that might force you to acknowledge that the Russians aren't the good guys here, is fake, just like that...come on dude, that's poast-tier.
@dave there's not "tons of supporting evidence" and investigations into it were denied. the mayor of bucha when discussing russia leaving never even bothered to mention such a massacre.. because it didn't happen, any the video comes from ukranian national police with no other witnesses. it's a hoax. sorry that you easily fall for war propaganda.

https://www.republicworld.com/world-news/russia-ukraine-crisis/at-unsc-russia-asks-why-moscows-request-for-meeting-was-rejected-uk-responds-articleshow.html
> investigations were denied

So you're saying you can't find tons of press footage of war reporters walking around and filming/photographing the dead bodies? Because that's what it sounds like you're saying.
@dave what I've seen is *ukranian national police* doing such things. here's is scott ritter on it, former USMC intelligence officer

https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=XBZ0nWt3WKU
@e @dave
>Here's Scott Ritter, RT contributor and convicted pedophile, on the issue
I assumed this guy was a Russia apologist of some kind, but I didn't realize he worked for Russian state media, lol.
@dave @e no he just hates the US, that's a different thing, just kinda clicks at the moment.
@cereal @dave >I have to hate or like x country to be skeptical of war propaganda
@cereal @dave he could have just as easily been talking about me with the way it was written. anyways, why did russia massacre civilians when they did humanitarian corridors?
@e @dave anyways, why are you throwing mud when you're found out to be dim?
He's not dim, he's just young and hotheaded and is having his views openly challenged.
@dave @cereal so you'll question those photos but nothing else?
I question plenty else. But what you've presented is photos of two dead guys (out of the ~1000 people that died) lying in the street, that appear to have armbands on.

Even if I grant everything that you are asserting with these photos (that these video stills are from Bucha in the aftermath of the occupation, and that they show 2 people with pro-Russia armbands on), that would still be easily explained by the fog of war. It doesn't disprove that many other bodies were sighted and mass graves were being dug while the city was under Russian occupation.
@dave @cereal >It doesn't disprove that many other bodies were sighted and mass graves were being dug while the city was under Russian occupation.
it's really easy to trick idiots, just dig a hole and then say russia did it
You are unironically posting propaganda from a Russian state media official with an insane theory that contradicts basic facts about the timeline and are now implying we're the gullible ones here. You've also pivoted from "Ukraine killed them" to "nobody killed them".

Good news is that at least you don't need to hit the gym today what with all this goalpost-moving you've been doing.
@dave @cereal you are the two referencing wikipedia. here's a ukranian commander telling his solder's to kill non-blue armbands (aka civilians)

https://nitter.pussthecat.org/RWApodcast/status/1510635133627514881#m

>Lat night, Sergey "Boatsman" Korotkikh, infamous Neo-Nazi & member of Azov, posted a video titled "The BOATSMAN BOYS in Bucha". At the 6 second mark you can clearly hear the dialogue:
>"There are guys without blue armbands, can I shoot them?"
>"Fuck yeah"
If something was posted on April 3rd referencing something posted "Last night", what date was the thing referenced posted?

Like, come on dude, they are literally walking past a burnt-out AFV of some kind. These comments were clearly made in the aftermath, and it even seems like you haven't even absorbed "these bodies and mass graves started appearing in March, when the city was under Russian control" into your noggin yet. At least I think you haven't, since you're posting a video that was recorded after the city was retaken and presenting it like it's supposed to be evidence of who killed who in that massacre.

Also, your first source being an RT guy and your 2nd source being fucking Russians With Attitude is really something. Strong "independent thinker" energy with your choice of sources.

Russians With Attitude at least you don't know what their affiliation is, but they are not at all reliable either, and having it pointed out to you that you are uncritically presenting as the truth what a Russian state media reporter is claiming should give you pause.
Follow

@dave @e @cereal consortiumnews.com/2022/04/04/

the main point I've heard is that the bodies were recent, not bloated as one would expect to them to be after several days of occupation

with little else to go on, the time line doesn't add up

qui bono

· · SubwayTooter · 0 · 0 · 0
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.