Today on Oxide and Friends, @ahl and I will be joined by our colleagues to tell the tale of Reverso, an interesting (and deceptively simple!) piece of hardware that has proved essential to scaling manufacturing. Join us today, 5p Pacific!
@LaChasseuse @Catfish_Man It's cute but pretty obviously not how Palantir would actually advertise. I'm still in favor of guerilla art protesting surveillance capitalism though
Perhaps you have thought to yourself, *I'm* on board the Psychology of Software Teams train, but how can I subtly let others know? How can I identify fellow POST fans in the wild?? What if we need to organize around the radical notions of thriving, motivation, self-compassion and psychological safety??
Well if you find me at a 2026 conference or book reading you can get a TINY PROPAGANDA STICKER
Will Ashley achieve her skateboard dreams?? Are our heuristics around learning making it impossible for us to learn? Can you improve your adherence to your goals?? Latest Change, Technically is another LEARNING STRATEGIES episode!
https://www.changetechnically.fyi/2396236/episodes/19131922-you-have-bad-mental-models-of-learning
Under-reported details of the xAI/Anthropic Colossus data center deal: Anthropic get Colossus 1 but xAI keep using the larger Colossus 2, Colossus 1 has a REALLY bad environmental record, and xAI just shut down a bunch of older models on 2 weeks' notice https://simonwillison.net/2026/May/7/xai-anthropic/
As a non-binary person who used to have internalised enbyphobia, I can't help but notice the accidentally artistic poignancy of a de-non-binary person arguing relentlessly against structurelessness— or rather, arguing that structurelessness does not exist.
I analyzed my coding sessions and on the text interactions some words stand out. And well, they also show up on Google Trends as spiking. Oh and so much slop in my Twitter mentions and on GitHub. Thus here are some updated thoughts on all of this. https://lucumr.pocoo.org/2026/5/4/content-for-contents-sake/
If you haven't read Benjamin Breen's thoughts on Talkie, you should! I agree that this is an exciting moment, exactly because we don't quite know yet what these things (historical language models) can or can't legitimately do.
There are going to be temptations and false steps. Breen mentions +
Are "Vintage LLMs" the start o...
@jonny @albertcardona but that’s kind of my point: I don’t think we *have* (or have ever had) ‘definitions of learning’ by which NNs ‘don’t learn’, precisely because “learn” is a (crude) description of a behaviour, not something defined in mechanistic terms…
I’ve never understood NNs as attempting to provide a ‘definition of learning’ itself, though they provide a mechanism, which might or might not have relevant similarities to human learning depending on level of description or detail one is interested in….
“adjusting weights via backprop” is a mechanism, not a system level behaviour and my original reply was that the statment “LLMs don’t “think” they just compute probability distributions” confuses behaviours and behaviour generating mechanisms…
to my mind, that’s not a ‘semantic debate’ or argument about meaning but about a deeper conceptual confusion that seems common in those kinds of articles…
whether pointing *that* out is interesting or enlightening is, of course, a different matter ;-)
uspol
Sergey Brin is a case study in why billionaires should not exist.
It didn't quite manage to draw me a pelican riding a bicycle, but I still appreciated its era-appropriate response
code / data wrangler in Switzerland.
Recovering reply guy. Posts random photos once in a while.