I was only in San Francisco for a few hours and yet I managed to have an "encounter" with a Waymo.

I don't mean "I saw a Waymo"--they were all over the place, you can't miss them--I mean *encounter* as in the thing swerved into my lane...
1/n

I've been saying for years that self-driving technology isn't ready, it will not *be* ready for a long-ass time, and there's almost no way to trust the tech companies to accurately *tell us* when/if it is ready. Not when there's billions to be made.

Beyond that...

2/n

The problem with self-driving technology isn't even *primarily* "safety" but the *shift in liability*, meaning the liability is tossed in a black hole. This is the *prime function* of a lot of tech (including genAI), but esp self-driving--a story is told that it's "safer than humans"...

3/n

...but the tech companies bury the data, they're *incentivized* to make wild unsubstantiated claims (because no one ever calls them on it), and in the end, no tech CEO is going to jail because a Waymo murdered someone. At worst, they lose stock options.

So I have some pretty strong opinions...
4/n

You could be forgiven for thinking "Sure, Sue, you're in SF for 2 hours and a Waymo jumps in front of you? Are you sure?"

I was just as surprised as you. I mean, what are the odds...

...but this is also my point. The "odds" are pretty shitty actually we just don't know because *data burial*

5/n

WHAT HAPPENED: Waymo was stopped in the left hand lane (one-way street) while a car parallel parked in front of it. I was coming up on this situation in the next lane, to the right of the Waymo. The Waymo waited until the car was 3/4 parked, decided ig that was close enough...

6/n

The Waymo suddenly swerved into my lane to go around the not-yet-done-parallel-parking car. I didn't have to SLAM on the brakes (which is good because I had cars behind me), but there was substantial sudden braking required on my part.

Waymo rolled on without any hesitation or apparent notice

7/n

Follow

@susankayequinn looks like there's some "tuning" going on sfchronicle.com/sf/article/way, which they will hopefully get in trouble for.
As for the liability, Uber has a similarly effective solution that doesn't require $30b (and counting) of investment: it stops with the driver-contractor. They do provide additional insurance, but they usually can't be sued themselves AFAICT.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.