I strongly believe that pushing normies into STEM was a net-negative for engineering.
Engineering and science were the fields that people with genuine interest and/or undiagnosed Aspergers gravitated towards and were professions where those types of individuals could apply their talents more naturally. The meme of the engineer personality has allot of overlap with Aspergers personality traits and quirks.
By telling everyone that the only way to make good money was STEM and ramrodding it down the throat of people who wouldn't have immediately chosen it, I think it's degraded the quality of the engineering workforce at large as well as the result of said workforce's work product.

Maybe I'm overreaching with the Aspergers part, but I'm very certain that the insane promotion of STEM has ended up damaging STEM instead. These aren't career fields for normies and the influx of normies is damaging our ability to build quality stuff.
@maid@shitposter.world there isn't enough jobs there for normies or otherwise. not to mention dei and h1b
@satsuki STEM jobs aren't for normies. They're for the kind of naturally intelligent person who's intelligence is at the expense of social skill. The reason engineering commanded the pay it once did is because there's not that many people. By trying to diversify a field that produces its best work when it's occupied by people who think and operate in very similar ways only weakens the field.
Follow

@maid
Why is a field more important than people's choice? I don't think there is any benefits-humanity angle beyond the financial benefits for the people in it.
@satsuki

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.