@kravietz ...what? This article does some strange flips by insinuating that the environmentalist position is to stop using fossil fuels altogether, rather than stop using them as, well, fuels, which is the main way in which they contribute to climate change.

There is a point there to be made about the cost of moving away from fossil fuels as fuels, but if the article is using such dishonest tactics as implying this would stop us from using them in other ways, well, I'm not inclined to trust it.

Much of this article talks about nuclear energy and that part is decent, but there are worrying statements there that too me look like parts of the latest goalpost shift from the climate crisis inaction propaganda. Especially the comment about carbon capture, a technology that is at this point much less likely to work than even going full renewable.