@Andy_Scollick This seems like a sensationalist account if you compare it with the IAEA report of the same event: https://www.iaea.org/newscenter/pressreleases/update-200-iaea-director-general-statement-on-situation-in-ukraine
@tobychev "It was the ZNPP’s first complete external power outage since May 22 this year." In other words, if external main power and back up lines hadn't been restored and diesel stock for back-up generators had been exhausted - as one might expect when the fighting closes in on ZNPP in the coming months - then there's a risk of meltdown. Either the Russians leave ZNPP and area without a fight or surrender or they get liquidated on site. You were saying about "sensationalist"?
@Andy_Scollick Is "Last night, the occupationists almost ended up in a bad way." really compatible with "if nothing was done before diesel stores run out"? To me, that's a sensationalist framing. Here I also note the IAEA mention of reactor 4 "now" transitioning from "semi-hot shutdown" to hot, which to me strongly implies *action was taken* by the operators to lower the output of the core during the loss of external power.
More generally, the employees at the IAEA take substantial risks to bring us largely impartial accounts of what happens at the ZNPP precisely so we don't have to trust the word of the belligerents, who both try to use the dangerous situation at the ZNPP as a propaganda weapon.
@Andy_Scollick Why should you know?