It depends on exactly what happens in the arguments and rulings.
For example, this Washington ruling said it was declining a national injunction, so the ruling only applies to the plaintiff states.
It's just part of the federal system of the US not to put all the eggs in one basket, so different states do have different laws being enforced.
In fact, I FINALLY came across someone posting, well, only the conclusion of the TX opinion, while they posted the whole WA opinion.
The TX opinion also declined to offer a national injunction, and so they could technically coexist.
(As a side note, it's fishy for people to argue over the two opinions but only present the arguments of they one they agree with. Let's see both so we can see where the wrong one went wrong, so we can fact check!)
