Pinned toot

There’s an old idea of fairness that when cutting a cake between two people one person cuts and the other picks the piece they want.

This method aligns the interests of both parties, no matter how corruptible and human they may be.

I think it’s underappreciated how often the US government design has a similar method in its checks and balances: one group can reject an official, but they don’t get to choose the replacement.

See, for example, impeachment proceedings.

After all: “This policy of supplying, by opposite and rival interests, the defect of better motives, might be traced through the whole system of human affairs, private as well as public.”

–Hamilton (maybe)

Pinned toot

To understand the state of , and US society more broadly, a person has to realize that the process against isn’t merely two camps who want the guy found innocent or guilty after a weighing of the evidence.

No, it is as if there was a murder trial where one side believed they were having beers with the purported victim as the trial was going on.

It’s not a matter of legal technicality or weighing preponderances of evidence or reasonable doubt; it’s a matter of the country being divided over fundamental fact, here whether a person is alive or not.

It’s not a political division. Sadly it’s a reality division.

When Marjorie Taylor Greene hammers Johnson on the basis of his being “the Republican leader” she shows her own ignorance, but more importantly, she expresses a critical misunderstanding that’s pretty rife throughout the US population.

No, Johnson is not the Republican leader. As Speaker he’s the voice of the entire House, including Democrats, in contrast to Steve Scalise, who as Majority Leader is the actual Republican leader.

The reason this isn’t mere technicality is that Democrats absolutely have a say in the Speaker and can support or oppose the ouster of a speaker and choice of a new one.

is an idiot, though the public can be excused for not knowing this detail. Unfortunately, politicians take advantage of that, contributing to congressional dysfunction.

volkris boosted
volkris boosted

Anyone got an example of an #ActivityPub object with type: "Article"? #mastoDev

volkris boosted

@m well it’s not that posts are called notes but that of the types defined by ActivityStreams some interfaces have chosen to mark content that way.

As per the standard a note “Represents a short written work typically less than a single paragraph in length.”

Arguably this that I’m typing here is a document, not a note, regardless of what Mastodon thinks of it.

w3.org/TR/activitystreams-voca

volkris boosted

@timbray

Mastodon restrictions:
Issue 1: You can only upload max 4 photos per post.
Issue 2: You can only see max 4 photos per post EVEN if that post have more than 4 attached. It throws everything else to a black hole without informing its users that they are missing something.

For Issue 2, all other
#fediverse software will display the images attached. They won't shoot content into a blackhole.

For Issue 1, different fediverse software have different limitations, but definitely not max of 4 per post.

So, personally, if you want to use the fediverse for images, art, photography, your best option is Pixelfed; or any other fediverse software for that matter as long as it is not Mastodon.

^_~

@dansup

An update on and description of distributed capabilities, including a long segment on distributed labeling and moderation, and how the way / handles it promotes contention on this platform.

I always say, there’s a lack of focus on technology serving users here, with instances being the primary focus, and that’s a shame.

techdirt.com/2024/03/27/why-bl

volkris boosted

Listening to #metal #music? Posting about it on mastodon.social?

There are more underground ways to metal up your timeline! Join metalhead.club :damnified: 💪

... and contribute to a more decentralized #Fediverse 🤘

Conservative media loves to repeat that the NY court imposed improper penalties against Trump’s businesses considering that they were already being overseen by a court appointed official that would keep them from doing wrong.

Problem is, the overseer reported to the court that they kept doing wrong.

It’s a case where the details swing the superficial claim in the other direction.

So many get wrong, and so many misreport, that the is to rule on the safety of mifepristone. It is not.

The Court has neither the expertise, the legal jurisdiction, nor the interest in making such a determination. It’s absolutely not what the Court is doing.

Instead, what the Court is to rule on is specifically the legal questions surrounding whether the executive branch followed legal procedures as it acted.

It seems that the FDA didn’t follow the legal process and botched this, and we should be holding executive branch officials responsible for their failure there.

All of the drama protesting the Court misplaces the real blame and lets those responsible off the hook, and is so counterproductive to the goals of those protesters.

supremecourt.gov/DocketPDF/23/

volkris boosted

The same thing that Threads might allegedly do to Mastodon is apparently absolutely desirable when Mastodon does it to the rest of the Fediverse; CW: long (914 characters), Fediverse meta, non-Mastodon Fediverse meta, Threads/Meta/Facebook/Zuckerberg 

Threads might overrun the Fediverse with its own rules, its own culture and its own non-standard technology, simply by being the biggest project in the Fediverse and making itself the de-facto Fediverse standard by sheer numbers. Mastodon users are up in arms against it.

Mastodon itself has been doing all these very same things to the rest of the Fediverse ever since 2016. Largely the very same Mastodon users who are raging against Threads now are not only cheering on Mastodon forcing its ways and its non-standard stuff upon everything that isn't Mastodon, but demanding more of it.

Just for the record: Mastodon was not here first. At least Friendica, Hubzilla and Pleroma were, in this order. And Hubzilla even had ActivityPub before Mastodon.

#Long #LongPost #CWLong #CWLongPost #FediMeta #FediverseMeta #CWFediMeta #CWFediverseMeta #Fediverse #Mastodon #Meta #Threads #Hypocrisy #DoubleStandard

Many here joined the bandwagon of outrage over ’s use of the word bloodbath, but I don’t think many realize how counterproductive that was.

have been milking that outrage to their benefit, using it to frame anti-Trump speakers as out of touch or flat out duplicitous, saying they’re intentionally misunderstanding or misrepresenting what Trump was saying.

The thing is, what Trump was [apparently] saying is actually idiotic. THAT is what needs to be called out.

It’s just the sad norm of strategic misstep: Trump will say something really stupid, but instead of pointing out how dumb he is, folks give him not only a pass but actual ammunition through unfounded attacks.

And that’s how we got and may get President Trump.

It's instructive that the most rabidly anti conservative figures seem to be coming from a place of being completely out of touch with and misunderstanding the youths.

I keep hearing them say, Where did [insert idea] come from? Nobody was talking about that before the Chinese started manipulating kids through the TikToks!

But of course, they were talking about it, just in different circles that the speaker wasn't aware of.

This says a lot about many topics and many sides, but generally:
Echo chambers promote ignorance that leads to assumptions that manifest in heavy handed non-solutions to misidentified problems.

And all too naturally, those proposals will tend to be rather authoritarian efforts to fix people.

Implementing a “Share on Mastodon” button for a blog
Normally, adding a share button to a blog is a trivial task. In case of Mastodon, it is complicated by the fact that you need to choose your home instance. And it is further complicated if you decide to support further Fediverse applications beyond …

palant.info/2023/10/19/impleme

These days the phrase “you can’t make this stuff up” is so overused that really it comes across as,

Oh no, I CAN make this stuff up, and I can make a lot of other stuff up too.
You can’t?
Are you really so low functioning that this is beyond your imagination?
Well that explains a lot of the other dumb ideas you have.

You can’t make this stuff up has become a brag from people who, well, honestly probably aren’t smart enough to make such things up on their own.

volkris boosted

Via #SpaceX: “Starship re-entering Earth's atmosphere. Views through the plasma.”

#Starship #Artemis #NASA

Apparently this is a website demonstrating / and interactions all being intermingled as they engage with the post.

I’m not sure exactly what’s going on, but at first glance it’s pretty interesting to see.

nerdy.dev/this-site-now-suppor

volkris boosted

@annaleen I can understand the meaning of losing Twitter for many people, who made their living by connecting there.
However, Twitter was as public as X is today, meaning it wasn't. It never was yours nor "ours". If it was actually public, it could not have been sold to Musk in the first place. The means of its past owners just aligned more with yours, by incident.

Oof, I just realized i forgot to hashtag USPolitics, which I always try to do to help people filter that out of their own timelines.

My apologies to anyone who sees my post but was trying to avoid politics on their feeds! I completely understand that position!

Show thread

The big problem with the State of the Union speech was that instead of speaking to the whole country about the whole country, it focused on speaking to his own choir about himself and his reelection.

That’s why people are criticizing it as a campaign speech.

If you’re a Biden supporter, realize that the speech did not invite non-supporters, including independents, to join in his efforts. It appealed only to those already on board, which is not productive in terms of actually getting those efforts done.

In other words, if you’re in favor of what Biden was calling for, you too should be critical that this won’t help get those things done.

The speech seemed focused on helping nobody… except Joe Biden’s personal reelection.

Growing up in the US, decades ago, I was cautiously optimistic about the future for the US government:
Sure, folks had ideological, philosophical, and political differences, but we’d keep on having a big social conversation, challenging each other, to come to a positive consensus, all as the government itself continued to maintain its core functions, shaped by the ongoing debate.

It seemed at the time as if we were working with a rough draft, and things would keep getting better. The government had good bones, to borrow an analogy.

The thing I find so depressing about as the
nominee isn’t ideological. It’s that we’re now facing a race where the idea of actually administering a functional government isn’t even a significant issue to voters. I never see it coming up in mainstream conversation from either the left or the right.

This is one reason I’m so obsessed about , because in my lifetime it’s regressed so terribly, from a functional government that’s responding to productive debate to one where functionality isn’t particularly interesting to the average voter.

The US population has lost faith in government over this time, but the problem is, well, that’s what they voted for by nominating people like and Trump.

It’s why Super Tuesday was a symbol of this regression of the US government to me, even if it had become inevitable.

Show more
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.