Pinned post

Under US national labs found themselves hamstrung by micromanagement, demands from the administration that resources be diverted away from while regulators repeatedly shut down programs much to the chagrin of our International partners.

It's been a breath of fresh air that the new administration has allowed us to actually get back to work. I don't even care if they know what they are doing, at least they are no longer interfering. Science is getting back on track now.

Regardless of everything else that might be getting into, and maybe it's just because he's just that incompetent, at least the US is getting back on track with its scientific endeavors. Our experiments are getting back up to speed after years of crippling bureaucracy, and we can start making progress again.

There's a lot to complain about with Trump, but I am very glad to see that the expectations for science are living up to what I'd hoped.

Pinned post

Lately I've been thinking about how the party has evolved over the last decade or so as viewed through the lens of the games that major voices in the party play.

Previous generations of speakers were proudly golfers, but lately major voices are football fans. You can hear them make that shift from talking about golf to talking about football.

Well, over the years Republicans have made this marked shift from looking to work together and build consensus to just looking to fight their opponents. And it strikes me that that's also a difference between golf and football.

The new generation of conservative speakers don't understand the realities of political systems where they have to work with others, convince others, to get things done. It's as if they are projecting philosophies from football on to their politics in ways that didn't happen previously.

And that's a shame for us all. That's how you get ... and .

Pinned post

There's an old idea of fairness that when cutting a cake between two people one person cuts and the other picks the piece they want.

This method aligns the interests of both parties, no matter how corruptible and *human* they may be.

I think it's underappreciated how often the US government design has a similar method in its checks and balances: one group can reject an official, but they don't get to choose the replacement.

See, for example, impeachment proceedings.

After all: "This policy of supplying, by opposite and rival interests, the defect of better motives, might be traced through the whole system of human affairs, private as well as public."

--Hamilton (maybe)

supporters are saying that encouraged to apologize to Trump, saying that helped Musk come to his senses.

What they don't realize is, this fits into the model whereby folks like Vance are manipulating Trump, who is too petty and oblivious to notice.

A couple of figures like Vance know exactly how to play the game and manipulate Trump and his supporters. This is another case of that happening.

Mainstream media take on vs seems to be settling on the idea that has poor impulse control, but good on Trump for being a mature statesman.

Just so you know.

Siiiigh.

It's always worth reading for yourself rulings like those against Trump's tariffs, as you just know the reporting on it will be questionable, from both sides.

One really funny thing is that Trump has once again shot himself in the foot with all his nonsense of "they've been screwing us for years!" which means that isn't an emergency and thus doesn't justify emergency imposition of tariffs.

cit.uscourts.gov/sites/cit/fil

NPR: "Under the Constitution, Congress has the power of the purse."

Siiiigh, that kind of line might be okay in informal banter, but for a legit news organization actually trying to explain legal matters to their readers, it's just not right.

It gets into the realm of reporters begging questions with hand waving behind vague idiom. They might as well just say everybody knows blah blah blah.

They should have instead informed readers with what the Constitution actually says and legal disputes through history if they wanted to get into it. But all that gets hidden behind this often misinterpreted throwaway line.

Do better, . Our society desperately needs it.

Listening to the unedited argument over the birthright citizenship process, the appointed justices continue to be just the worst. Just want to pull my hair out, these justices are completely unqualified, making a joke out of the courts.

Just right off the bat they were making arguments, not asking questions making arguments, that went against history and went against even how courts themselves work. It's like, somehow you managed to find yourself on the Supreme Court but... have you ever been in a court? Because that's not how this works.

From not knowing the role of courts in the US system through seeming to be unaware of other parts of the judicial system through asking bizarre questions about why they themselves don't do things that they themselves can do, they are just bizarre and just pathetic.

But we knew that when they were up for confirmation. Democrats confirmed se these people that clearly were not up for job.

In the end they just came across as children stomping their feet and asking why they can't just make the whole country do what they want to do.

And it's just really a shame.

We need better people in that position to counter but unfortunately we just have these small-minded justices who can't carry an argument.

Idiot Republicans: was limiting the import of metals and magnets to the US, and that was ruinous to the country. Therefore must... limit the import of metals and magnets.

Today's mainstream conservatives are dumber than I ever remember them being, as if after COVID they rejected any deep thought or professional analysis as elitist.

volkris boosted

The huge changes in the new deal once again underscore that botches everything he gets personally involved in, so the strategy is to distract him or wait until he gets bored and wander off, and then the real adults can actually work on solutions.

Even if they give him credit for show.

It's important to hammer home on this because it tells even his own political side that regardless of what his beliefs are, he's going to fail to deliver what they want.

I doubt Trump would have been elected had we been emphasizing this the whole time, instead of the opposite.

Gift Articles  
The tables have turned, and Putin’s Russia is now in dire trouble https://www.telegraph.co.uk/gift/44bef2806b3a8d37
volkris boosted

tpyo levels are currently at 47% but fluctuating wildly

(47%) ■■■■□□□□□□

The announcement of a deal on minerals continues a pattern that people need to emphasize, that they should have been emphasizing all along: botches everything he touches.

Yet again, his personal involvement in something blew up *his own program*, and it wasn't until he wandered off that it could be cleaned up.

Had we been emphasizing this long, long history of his bungling things there could have been consensus now that he's incompetent. Instead, so many promoted ideas that he would successfully implement right-wing governance models... which validated his candidacy.

We wouldn't have a president Trump today if his opponents had pointed out his record of inability to govern instead of promoting him as an effective dictator.

volkris boosted

#Mastodon
#Fediverse
#Commentary

Mastodon Exit Interview | Rob’s Posts

v.cx/2025/04/mastodon-exit-int

I am currently winding down the Mastodon bots I used to post sunrise and sunset times. The precipitating event is that the admin of the instance hosting the associated accounts demanded they be made nigh-undiscoverable, but the underlying cause is that it’s become increasing clear that Mastodon isn’t, and won’t ever be, a good platform for “asynchronous ephemeral notifications of any kind”. I’d also argue (more controversially) that it’s simply not good infrastructure for social networking of any kind. There are lots of interesting people using Mastodon, and I’m sure it will live on as a good-enough space for certain niche groups. But there is no question that it will never offer the fun of early Twitter, let alone the vibrancy of Twitter during its growth phase. I’ve long since dropped Mastodon from my home screen, and have switched to Bluesky for text-centric social media.

volkris boosted
OpenDyslexic font looks like this. I'm not dyslexic, but I was curious whether it improved my reading. it doesn't, but here's what it looks like.

it is available here: https://opendyslexic.org/

Mainstream Republican media has devolved into children on the playground stomping their feet and yelling "Not fair!" every time they lose a game they don't even understand.

All the hyperventilating about fascism is unhelpful, but they're just annoyingly pathetic.

They're not even interesting most of the time.

I just have to laugh at this headline.

Chinese communist owned stores? That's funnily contradictory in itself, but add in the military part, an organization that by necessity has some communist-type structures involved, and well...

Gentleman, there's no fighting in the war room!

The Gateway Pundit  
GOP Rep Introduces Bill After Discovering Chinese Communist-Owned Stores on US Military Base https://www.thegatewaypundit.com/2025/04/gop-rep-intr...
volkris boosted

incompetence levels are 50% and steady

(50%) ■■■■■□□□□□

Both and are past their prime and not all there mentally.

There is a crucial difference in their presidencies, though: I didn't hear many people relying on Biden personally, but I hear a ton of people saying that these don't seem right, but they trust that Trump knows what he's doing.

Even Trump supporters don't think it's right, but they think he knows what he's doing.

It's a mess.

volkris boosted

@0x00string I'm honestly curious what you're talking about.

Yeah, I did other things that year. But what are you talking about?

People seem not to understand that the presidency is defined by the Constitution; it's not subject to compliance, voluntary or otherwise.

I'm not the president by definition. It doesn't matter if I agree; it doesn't matter if I refuse to accept that I'm not the president; by definition I'm not because I don't fulfill the constitutional definition of what the president is.

All this talk about Trump refusing to accept an election or, in the last couple of days, saying he would take a third term misses that it's not up to him. He can think he's the president all he wants, but the Constitution, not Trump's beliefs, define whether or not he is the president.

I wish more people understood this because it's an important part of understanding how the US government is designed.

And it's an important part of ignoring trolling.

Under US national labs found themselves hamstrung by micromanagement, demands from the administration that resources be diverted away from while regulators repeatedly shut down programs much to the chagrin of our International partners.

It's been a breath of fresh air that the new administration has allowed us to actually get back to work. I don't even care if they know what they are doing, at least they are no longer interfering. Science is getting back on track now.

Regardless of everything else that might be getting into, and maybe it's just because he's just that incompetent, at least the US is getting back on track with its scientific endeavors. Our experiments are getting back up to speed after years of crippling bureaucracy, and we can start making progress again.

There's a lot to complain about with Trump, but I am very glad to see that the expectations for science are living up to what I'd hoped.

Show older
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.