@trz4747@mstdn.social

You said there were erroneous assumptions and reasoning.

Quoting two terms--not even the judge's own words as he explicitly points out in the opinion--don't amount to citations of either erroneous assumption or reasoning.

What I'm really interested in seeing, though, is the specific error in reasoning that would lead to a different outcome.

(And one thing to keep in mind is that courts in the US system are required to accept questionable assumptions in certain parts of the process, especially preliminary ones.)