#SCOTUS | Supremely Arrogant https://www.nytimes.com/2023/05/06/opinion/supremely-arrogant.html?smid=nytcore-ios-share&referringSource=articleShare If the court overturns or sharply limits the Chevron precedent, it would become easier for business owners to challenge regulations across the economy. Those include rules aimed at ensuring that the air and water are clean; that food, drugs, cars and consumer products are safe; and that financial firms do not take on too much risk
Reigning in Chevron brings judicial proceedings more in line with the laws passed by the democratic processes, that's all.
So that statement is pretty off base, as it means businesses would also find it harder to challenge regulations that weaken environmental protections built into law.
It means it would be harder to duck statutory authority regardless of whether the regulations are pro- or anti-environment, which is part of the point.
