@Mary625@mstdn.social That's still backwards.
The US said this resolution was not going to work, so it is BECAUSE they wanted to save more people that they said the resolution needs to be more serious.

The US said that the international community needs serious responses, not rushed or symbolic responses, and called on the UN to propose something that would actually save lives.

Basically the US didn't think the resolution was strong enough against anybody engaging in the bloodshed, saying that under this resolution the bloodshed would have continued, so the UN needs to get serious.