Do the people stating that Meta can’t possibly “monetize” posts originating from other fedi services not believe that Threads users are going to experience, for example, Mastodon posts as *part of their Threads timeline*…which is algorithmically populated and will get monetized as soon as Meta flips ads on?
Is there any documented reason not to believe that this not the most likely outcome?
@kissane Well I think it's complicated on all sides because on one hand the meta haters don't let reality interfere with their claims, and on the other side meta itself seems kind of poorly run, so I'm not sure they know how they are going to monetize the information they vacuum up.
So it ends up being unreasonable people complaining about unreasonable people around a topic that is fundamentally unreasonable.
There's no high road there. Just a mess.
