A new question on #Threads federation...

As the current state is #Threads "pushing" some content to the #fediverse, it means that it should accept incoming reports for abuse from #fediverse servers, even if the accounts have been selected among #Threads employees.

Does anyone know if #Threads has implemented the features to receive and acknowledge abuse reports through federation?
If that is not the case, any status on when it will be implemented before full fledged outgoing federation?

@ericfreyss

Where, exactly and with specificity, is #Threads "pushing" content onto *anywhere on the #Fediverse?

Last I looked in any detail, seven (7) Threads profiles (Mosseri et al) could be *replicated* here on #Mastodon

You could Reply to those replica Threads profiles here on Mastodon, but your replies *here* did not propagate back to the real, parent profile on Threads

Unless something has changed radially in the last 30 hours

That's the limit of it

@FinchHaven @ericfreyss Pushing content to servers that federate with the source account is literally how #ActivityPub works.

So, where is #Threads pushing content into to the #Fediverse? To any server that federates with it.

Follow

@downey well, there is the detail that other instances subscribe in the course of federation.

So the push is really fulfilling a request on the part of the original server.

@FinchHaven @ericfreyss

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.