@policykeys no, such a thing would undermine the system of checks and balances while not actually doing much to improve anything.

Reporting on the Court would paint it as just as politicized, but with more gaming involved with the randomization factor. It adds dice without actually solving anything.

And to be clear, it is emphatically the POTUS's job to fill an opening, not the Senate, and we need to hold presidents accountable when they fail.

We've let them slide way too much, but that's on us.