@tsyum but that's exactly what the Supreme Court said, that officials do seem confused about what constitutes violence, so legally they need to go work that out before it can be further addressed by the courts.

In this case the claim is that an "individual threw a piece of concrete or a similar rock-like object, striking respondent Officer Doe in the face. Officer Doe suffered devastating injuries in the line of duty, including loss of teeth and brain trauma."

I don't think it's particularly reasonable to consider that violent and consider how it would be handled under the state law, independent of anything involving protest.

So yep, SCOTUS said to go back and figure out some of the confusion about violence.

https://www.scotusblog.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/03/mckesson-v-doe.pdf