@LisaKalayji I believe you mean "cronyism". What do you think holds others back from competing in this space? Moderna, Pfizer...these companies do not have a monopoly on information or effective technology. They DO have something much more effective; permission from the government to sell you something. The government are the ones controlling what you're allowed to put into your own body, and who you can buy it from.

@AlexanderKingsbury @LisaKalayji they do have a monopoly on the information/technology that is required to make their vaccine. Patents.

@73ms

So much of the information is public. They don't have a monopoly on that.

They DO have a government enforced monopoly on *use of* that information, and that's what we should be reevaluating, the circumstances in which government should offer to enforce such monopolies.
@AlexanderKingsbury @LisaKalayji@sfba.social

@volkris patented information is public by definition but the monopoly concerns the right to utilize it.

Follow

@73ms yes, that's what I said: they don't have a monopoly on the information, as it's public by definition, but they have a monopoly on use of the information.

And that underscores the problem identified above.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.