Ahead of a significant meeting next month for members of the federal judiciary, a watchdog group hoisted another red flag over U.S. Supreme Court Justice 🔸Clarence Thomas 🔸for what it says is a
👉 “30 year pattern” of cherry-picking his financial disclosures once he is raked in the press.

The renewed call for review of the long-embroiled justice comes exactly a month before the "Judicial Conference of the United States" convenes for its first of only two meetings this year.

The group of federal judges, which is led by the chief justice of the Supreme Court, acts as a policymaking body for federal courts across the land and can also make recommendations to Congress.
It is, as ProPublica has reported at length, a powerful but largely opaque body that polices itself.

lawandcrime.com/high-profile/w

@cdarwin

#SCOTUS #ClarenceThomas #LawFedi #Legal #Taxes

Excellent recap of the #MAGA judge's consistent disclosure failures over several decades. Looks like a clear pattern.

Disclosure is just one thing. If you don't declare something in your income tax declarations, that often leads to #TaxFraud.

I hope someone in the #IRS and the #DoJ's #TaxDivision is looking at these (partially) new findings closely. They seem to be showing intent if fraud were involved.

c.im/@cdarwin/1119664163517969

Follow

@HistoPol The problem is that a lot of that has already been debunked.

It looks like a clear pattern if you don’t take into account that a lot of it just isn’t the sensational story that pro-publica is trying to sell to the public.

@cdarwin

@volkris

Hi there.

I've read similar reports regarding individual "mishandlings" from at least a dozen different sources over the last 15 months or so.

Which of the allegations have been debunked and by whom?

@cdarwin

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.