@gkmizuno I'm mainly interested in listening to the Supreme Court when I want to know what the Supreme Court said.
I think your quotation is pretty apt. To the extent that it disagrees with Conway, I'm going with the quotation.
@volkris If you read the concurring opinions of the 3 liberals, they state clearly:
Congress, the majority says, must enact legislation under Section 5 prescribing the procedures to “ ‘ “ascertain[ ] what particular individuals” ’ ” should be disqualified.
@gkmizuno but I repeat myself 🙂
When I want to know what the Supreme Court says I read what the Supreme Court says, and that also includes being pretty skeptical of positions and claims that the Supreme Court did not take up.
Often enough justices write things in their dissents that are just plain wrong, leading to the court not taking them up. And so what is written in the dissent Is just as questionable as something Conway wrote.
We have the ruling in front of us. We can see what it says for ourselves. The dissent is functionally little more than questionable commentary for us.
