#SCOTUS ‘has effectively replaced a very high bar for allowing insurrectionists… a supermajority [of] Congress—with the lowest bar imaginable… inaction’ nytimes.com/2024/03/04/opinion

2/3rds of states or a constitutional convention after a bloody civil war to write the amendment. One billionaire’s bribe to erase it. #SCOTUS

Follow

@vij no, it's the opposite: the Court *supported* the amendment's grant of power to Congress while pushing back against the idea that states could rise up and interfere in federal processes like that.

It's BECAUSE of a bloody civil war that states were somewhat disempowered here.

The Court upheld that principle.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.