It looks like Republicans failed to ban the abortion pills yesterday at the Supreme Court. But they have a plan to return next year that will astonish you:
https://hartmannreport.com/p/the-cold-dead-hand-of-anthony-comstock-fc3
@ThomHartmann
Your headline has me wondering about...
• how misinformed your audience is about how the #SCOTUS works
• how misinformed that you think that your audience is about how the #SCOTUS works
@flyoverproj sadly, misinformation about the functioning of the SCOTUS, and the US Government in general, is absolutely rampant these days.
It's pretty safe to assume any audience is misinformed.
@volkris
Thanks for that piece of resignation and cynicism.
Resignation? No. You have to know your audience so you can address them and see what you're working with, so you can move forward.
It's the opposite of resignation.
@volkris
I wasn't referring to
@ThomHartmann
in the previous post, I was referring to you dumping mush.
You're a cypher, I can't imagine what there is for you to deflect or why you would want to deflect criticism.
Again you're misunderstanding what I'm saying.
I'm not deflecting criticism, I'm explaining why it's important to know your audience when you're trying to make an argument.
No, I'm not.
You're a cipher pretending to understand Thom Hartmann enough to insist that you're correct, that “you” can speak for him. I dropped his handle because of that, because I know that he is real. “You” haven't put anything in your profile to substantiate your existence. I'm not saying that “you” are wrong, I'm dismissing “your” opinion outright.
“You” jumped into an exchange between other people uninvited.
https://gifdb.com/images/high/come-on-stop-it-3yn5njfte3q5kgo2.gif
@flyoverproj you are misunderstanding what I'm saying since what you are repeating back to me is not my position.
So, yeah.
