When a prosecutor or judge at the trial level are proven to be corrupt (bribery, falsifying evidence, suborning perjury,etc), the result of every case they were involved is subject to being overturned.
The same taint should apply to cases decided where the proven corrupt justices of scotus voted with the majority. Of course, there is no higher court than scotus, so it will be up to the successor justices to correct past decisions.
@bronakins Yes, but regardless, at least the rotten decisions (Citizens United, Immunity, Roe) will be overturned near immediately. The FIRST case that first new term that touches on the issue will be accepted by one of the liberal Justices to be considered by SCOTUS for being heard, and the majority vote it in, and in that ruling (however trivial) they also overturn the mad ruling of the past, in its entirety
🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽🤞🏽
Y’know I don’t need an abortion or even pregnancy care any more, yet it enrages me just as much today as when Dobbs was leaked, that trump’s scotus stole my right to determine my own health care. A stunningly ignorant decision by the supposed elite jurists.
@bronakins they didn't, though. That's not what the ruling said.
@volkris @bronakins blocked. Asshole