@iag2u that causes a lot of problems, not the least of which is, what if two different panels comes to different conclusions?
There is tremendous value in the US system that there is only one Supreme Court, not rolls of dice providing different Courts.
@volkris It would work like the lower appeals courts. Split the court in 2 with 9 justices hearing cases randomly assigned. So in theory they could handle 2x the case load. Could also have an appeal to the full court, but it would be a high bar for review.