By quashing the Harris endorsements - the story is now about the cowardice of two billionaires in the face of a Hitler-adjacent con man.
Bezos has taken a revered publication and trashed it. The brand is forever sullied. Patrick Soon-Shiong has done the same with the LA Times (although it doesn't have the same storied history as Wapo).
Integrity does matter. And the non-endorsements ironically help Harris. @KamalaHarrisWin
@NZedAUS @KamalaHarrisWin
Here's a article following your line of reasoning. It explains the history and current politics of non-endorsements that people learn are quashed, which I posit could be intentional as they ironically will get "better press" and get a subtler message that one candidate is running a campaign of intimidation across.
Occam's razor would have us consider that maybe, just maybe, it's not actually a conspiracy here, but that they didn't endorse either candidate because they are both garbage.
Maybe they didn't endorse either candidate simply because neither candidate is worth endorsing.
That's certainly my feeling.
