#SCOTUS arguments becoming "we have studies" "no WE have studies" when honest people KNOW that one side has a preponderance of evidence. JFC have your assistants give you numbers but oh wait you'd lose.

Follow

@yamainu but that's exactly why under the US system the Supreme Court isn't charged with deciding between studies. That's not its job.

SCOTUS is to rule on law, not on studies.

It's the wrong forum to try to battle out studies. That's to be done in the other branch, the legislative bodies, not the judicial bodies.

THEY'RE the ones tasked with considering studies to set the law. After that, the courts are to rule on the laws as they were passed.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.