@larryneufeld It's not so simple.
The Supreme Court ruled based on an incomplete factual record because they rushed the case so much.
It's not that the Supreme Court gave sweeping powers to suppress Free speech but rather that they were wrong about Free speech not being suppressed. They don't think this suppresses Free speech particularly.
Yes, they are factually wrong. It's a real shame. But it does not have broad application because hopefully in future cases the facts will be sorted out.