Why in the world would you use a political action to resolve a legal dispute?
And jump through the extra hoops by imputing the motivations of multiple independent parties based on each others' motivations when motivations aren't relevant in the first place?
We have the legal arguments in front of us. We have the losing argument, and we have the winning argument laying out not only why it's right but also why the losing arugment is wrong.
But you're not bothering with any of that, just going right to personal attacks involving completely different governments.