The Thomas/Alito jurisdictional argument (that #SCOTUS must hear state-v.-state cases) isn't crazy. But one of the strongest arguments *against* it is that states shouldn't be able to force the Court to have to hear these kinds of suits. Thomas's dissent here may unintentionally reinforce that view.

RE: https://bsky.app/profile/did:plc:6h7b2i6ttw3l4t7pvbvxdith/post/3mmr4nfgcfk26

Follow

@stevevladeck.bsky.social

How do you figure Thomas's dissent reinforces that view?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.