Science is supposed to answer the HOW. Just claiming that it happens DESPITE it being IRRATIONAL and against all logic, is unacceptable for me.

Armed with your best explanations and having the world phsyicists behind you, its stramge that you cant present a convincing case,
There are too many leaps of faith required to accept SR. ad too many contradictions in the hypothesis.
For this reason I reserve judgement on any claimed experimental evidence that supports the hypothesis.

You have hardly thrashed my concerns with anything rational.

The best you have is that it just works somehow, and the results of the equations seem to fit the observations.
As Feynman said, a correct answer is not proof.

Im done with this, you have been unable to supply any slam dunk defense for a highly suspect hypothesis.
Thanks for trying though.

@zeccano

It does answer the how (though the deeper you go the more unanswered questions).

Dont confuse the fact that no one is willing to talk to you or explain to you how due to your obnoxious personality as being the same as there not being an answer.

Follow

@freemo Not agreeing with you is obnoxious?

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.