@readsteven
> me, with 65535 characters per post

I don't see it for mastodon.

Also, I don't know if you can really blame Twitter itself, at least in the first iteration, for how people chose to engage on the platform. In later iterations, possibly you could. The first go-round though, it seems like people could have done threads the same way they do now when they have more than 140 (or I guess they're at 253 now?) characters worth of something to say. to some extent you could probably blame text communications generally for ambiguity though: we all know, think, and feel more than we can say.