@inference @404zzz @thebiologist1117 The performance is good but it quickly becomes clear that it is a sketchy descendant of Arch Linux with some of the best wallpapers. Performance grows worse as new sketchy applications are installed.

The wallpapers are pretty cool but the system as a whole makes me want to move back to an FSF Approved Distro. God forbid if you want to use it for development. It's a distribution that demonstrates that apt might not be perfect but it is better than pacman.

The strong suit of the distribution is the wallpapers and some of the drivers. It will break on update just like Arch. Security is sketchy and perhaps the worst I've seen. There are many issues but I don't want to ramble on.

@AmpBenzScientist @404zzz @thebiologist1117 The security issues alone make me wish it didn't exist. Most of its users will think it's safe because it's Linux, which simply isn't true.

Manjaro users are in danger thanks to the incompetency of Majaro devs/maintainers. Simple as that.

It's so bad, it should be illegal.

@inference @404zzz @thebiologist1117 Arch isn't much better. A common theme is that resources are being taken up on horrible ideas like snap and flatpack.

@AmpBenzScientist @404zzz @thebiologist1117 At least Arch Linux doesn't tell users to bypass their own security and backdoor themselves.
Follow

@inference @404zzz @thebiologist1117 If anything breaks the system it will almost always be an Update. It happened to me 6 times over a few years and I still say that the community is the worst part of Arch Linux.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.