> The A407 100mm anti-tank gun M1977 is a Romanian rifled 100-mm anti-tank gun which serves as the main towed anti-tank gun of the Romanian Land Forces from 1975 until present.

towed anti-tank gun? romania, pls. WW2 was QUITE some time ago

@pony you are probably not following the RU-UK Donbas conflict too much, do you? It was back to WW2: two parties throwing tons of steel to each other. No air force involved, suddenly high quality anti-tank tech is **the** major tech advantage.

We always thought the next big war will be all air force, satellites, etc. Maybe not. Maybe it will be a throwback to WW2 again for some important reasons.

@FailForward yeah but even the most basic T-55 tank is a super-weapon compared to WW2 standards, very mobile and capable of precise fire, likely enhanced by some, even if very homemade, electronics to improve its awareness and vision, while AT guns got actually kinda worse, unlike the old 3.7 german PaK that could be grabbed by the crew and moved around on foot, this is completely immobile
@FailForward on the other hand, there was a big demand for any kind of artillery in all these modern conflicts and even the rich US army has towed howitzers, I don't know if they have anti-tank ammunition for them (probably yes?), but then the romanian gun lacks more advanced fire control to do that very well either
Follow

@pony On Wikipedia I read this thing has an extended effective firing range: anti-tank 3km, as a mortar 20km and anti-personnel 4km. If we focus on anti-tank operation, you said the disadvantage is that the thing is a hot sitting duck after the first shot. I don't know what is the range of IR homing systems, but 3+km seems rather far. As this can fire 7-15 rounds per minute, despite being an outdated design, I'd guess it can still inflict considerable damage at a relatively low cost before being shot down, so maybe it's not such a throwaway piece for Romanians. Think about it as operating your home server NAS on a 7-years old discarded laptop 😄 . But what do I know...

@FailForward i wonder how "effective" it actually is, both in accuracy (i see an optical sight, but no rangefinder and no fire control computer that would help you track a moving target, things that modern tanks have and still don't have perfect accuracy anyway) and possible penetration
Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.