J.D. Vance says that people who don't have children have no stake in the future.

Yet he's a Catholic: a religion headed by *checks notes* a childless Pope, and run by *checks notes again* thousands of childless priests. (Well, supposedly.)

And wait, news has just come in that Jesus, the man whose teachings Catholics claim to follow, was yet another man who (according to their own orthodoxy) had no children.

Childless people have no stake in the future.

Shouldn't he convert, or something?