L29Ah @L29Ah@qoto.org

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to Probably™ "anarchy" is defined objectively, and you can figure out the exact formula if you spend enough fucks.

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to Do ideologies exist?

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to I agree with the quoted part. We have the more important thing to do before waging wars with fellow anarchists about our preconceptions.

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to Dunno, we got a few dozens of ancaps with a more-or-less good agreement on NAP here in Montelibero project IRL. The internet collectivist anarchists just block me quickly, and i didn't have a chance to talk with individualists who don't accept the NAP as a form of an agreement at least (the basis of the union of egoists).

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to What article are you talking about? Apparently i got into your discussion at some intermediate point, and can't find the initial post in the abomination of a soapbox web interface.

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to Sure thing, bud. Sadly, the idea of so-called "objective world" helps us to group together to vastly improve our abilities to manipulate our "subjective experience". So i would stick to it, as i stick to the scientific method (especially useful when consuming heavy doses of mind-altering substances).

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to Sure, the rules aren't given us by some supernatural entity in a fancy book; we construct them for our own utility. They are as objective as a piece of paper they're written on. Sorry for the confusion.

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to but does your mom?

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to indeed there are corner cases in human understanding of language that result in variation; still that doesn't make heuristics easier to do aforementioned stuff with than rules

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to no u

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to A fixed set of rules are objective and nicely codified (and debated, discussed, propagated and debunked), unlike heuristic that don't cross human minds well, so a heuristic-based society is doomed to be small and/or warring.

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to I doubt ancap is collectivist much.

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to That's a claim; the authority one is just a definition of anarchism: anarchsm defines where authority can come from (not from a state), particular kinds of anarchim constrict it further.

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to Humans just can't keep themselves together and well-organized without some deontological-ish bullshit, sorry.

@cyberspook @nodefunallowed@mas.to i hereby throw feces at your strain of solipsism; omg you're taking stirner too seriously

@nodefunallowed@mas.to @cyberspook anarchism is about ethically legitimate sources of authority, not rejection or negation(sic) of it

@asdreemurr @rf https://get.gentoo.org

@PRINCE@mastodon.ml @rf https://get.gentoo.org

@emoblaze@mastodon.social @ru@lor.sh @rf Прекратить общение.