@maxkennerly The fact that the NYT thinks language models are capable of love to declare is just sloppy reporting from people who don't understand what they're interacting with.
@maxkennerly Yeah, and when TV/Radio came out, there was a subset of the population that believed whatever came out of those boxes was true. 🤷♂️
Familiarity will breed contempt.
@LouisIngenthron @maxkennerly But will it? Seems like there is currently a subset of the population that believes whatever they see on the internet is true (see the Q phenomanon). Familiarity hasn't bred contempt there, See also Fox News.
@cuibonobaby @maxkennerly Some people prefer to be lied to than adjust their worldview, and nobody can fix that. All you can do is wait for them to die out.
But the people who don't want to be lied to will get wise to it, yes.
@LouisIngenthron we live in hope.
@LouisIngenthron
a willingness to be lied to isn't a failure limited to any particular generation, I'm afraid.
@LouisIngenthron This is true, but also emblematic of a core ethical problem: most people don't understand what language models do. They're thus prone to, e.g., inferring cognition, to believing the hallucinations are factual, etc.