I've been viscerally opposed to regulating technology except the the most rare of circumstances.

That was before our new masters of the universe turned us into the subjects of black-box science experiments at accelerating speeds -- and fired the people who think about the ethics of it all.

This is unacceptable, and if the public doesn't wake up, a few mega-wealthy and powerful people could ruin everything for everyone but (temporarily) themselves.

@dangillmor Or you can just choose to opt-out of those "black-box science experiments".

If nobody used them, they'd vanish in a heartbeat.

But that requires self-control, which so few people seem to possess.

@LouisIngenthron @dangillmor I applaud and agree with your sentiment. unfortunately, it takes a concerted effort to opt out of those "black-box science experiments", which is more than most busy people have time for...

/1

Follow

@mcrocker @dangillmor Which tells you that the "science experiments" offer more value to those people than they take.

For example: I don't sign up for grocery store rewards programs because they're gross violations of privacy, but most people do. They just see a different value proposition than I do.

Sign in to participate in the conversation
Qoto Mastodon

QOTO: Question Others to Teach Ourselves
An inclusive, Academic Freedom, instance
All cultures welcome.
Hate speech and harassment strictly forbidden.