Maybe it's just me, but I think open-carrying while "protesting" automatically upgrades you to terrorist.
Legitimate free speech doesn't need to be backed with a threat of violence.
QT: https://journa.host/@w7voa/111081408709622409
@LouisIngenthron
I couldn't disagree more, because of
A) how police treat unarmed protesters.
B) Often the arms are symbolic of the point you're trying to make
You can't be a terrorist if you're not trying to terrorize the public.
A) If you're worried about police escalation, open-carrying makes that problem *worse* not better. What are you going to do, shoot at the police?
B) Then bring symbolic arms instead of real ones.
As far as I'm concerned, open-carrying is, in and of itself, an attempt to terrorize tho public (and that goes for armed police too).
And fwiw, I'm a CCL holder.
@john I participated in the BLM protests. We were a massive crowd of people in t-shirts surrounded by cops in full body armor, with long arms, mounted on horseback.
I am extremely certain that open-carrying would have made the situation worse in every way, and likely would have been rejected by the very people I was marching with.
@LouisIngenthron
> rejected by the very people I was marching with
They have every right to protest/demonstrate unarmed. It's possible it might be a more effective strategy depending on circumstance, and that's their call to make and their own safety to consider.
I've been to a protest unarmed surrounded by police (who outnumbered us significantly), though I suspect I was in less danger than what you're describing. Doesn't really change the point.