TikTok users worry about losing their social media platform, but First Amendment rights are on the line, too. There's a good argument for free speech protection of TikTok and its owners in this case, writes 2 law professors.
Imagine if the government told Jeff Bezos that he had to sell The Washington Post because it was worried that he might push a particular agenda.
Courts have long ruled that that sort of worry about future problems is unconstitutional:
https://theconversation.com/tiktok-law-threatening-a-ban-if-the-app-isnt-sold-raises-first-amendment-concerns-229879
#socialmedia
Imagine a better argument than this one.
@kevinrns @TheConversationUS Why? "Unconstitutional violation of free speech rights" is a pretty damn good argument on its own.
@LouisIngenthron @TheConversationUS
Jefferson was the one that added "in the Williamsburg Advertiser specificly " to the first Amendment.
Might as well say it abrogates the fifth amendment. Or fishing licences.