Liberals: We love LGBTQ+ folks.

Their bosses: New policy: fuck LGBTQ+ folks.

Liberals: Well, that’s ok too, we guess.

@aral Liberals, huh?

@dbattistella Alt text: first photo: screenshot of social media post:

Jason Hickel V @jasonhickel|
XI ...
The problem with liberalism is that it rests on a fundamental contradiction that cannot be resolved. It will always fail, it will always collapse, and this explains everything about our current moment.
Liberals try to hold two commitments at once: on the one hand, they are firmly committed to capitalism; on the other, they express support for principles like human rights, democracy, equality, freedom of speech, environment and the rule of law. This duality is the core of liberalism.
But there's a problem. Capital accumulation requires cheapening labour and nature. This eventually comes into direct conflict with principles like rights and equality. And whenever this conflict appears, the liberal ruling class sides with capital, abandons their lofty principles, and throws workers and nature under the bus. Every. Single. Time.
This results in flagrant displays of hypocrisy. They run on nice-sounding platforms but end up either betraying their promises or actively working against their stated values. They'll slash public services, bail out banks, imprison journalists, beat up students, expand fracking, coup democratically elected leaders in the global South, bomb liberation movements, fund a genocide - they'll even trash international law itself - anything that's needed to maintain the conditions for capital accumulation.
At most, they may try to negotiate mediocre compromises, a few social policies here and there - some abortion rights, a tiny increase in the minimum wage - but nothing that might pose any serious threat to capital accumulation. Thus the soul-crushing slowness of liberal incrementalism. Ultimately they are unwilling to take any of the obvious steps that would actually resolve our urgent social and ecological crises.
This is why nobody trusts liberal politicians. This is why they come across as so fantastically insincere, and even sneering. This is why they feel so spineless and *empty*.

@aral @dbattistella

So I guess the only valid alternative is communism as capitalism is what has delivered us to this state of crisis

@Paulos_the_fog @aral @dbattistella What’s wrong with offering socialism as the alternative? Why do you need to raise the spectre of another proven-failed ideology?

@KimSJ @aral @dbattistella

I would define socialism as a form of communism. I would dispute the premise that communism has ever been tried and failed, although I acknowledge that a lot of things that have been called 'communism', have been tried and have largely failed!

@Paulos_the_fog @aral @dbattistella
I think that’s backwards. I could accept that communism is a form of socialism, albeit an extreme and dysfunctional one. And the ‘no true Scotsman’ argument to defend communism is weak. The evidence so far is that ‘pure’ communism cannot exist, thanks to human nature.